|
Conservative vs.
Liberalism Response
Right to Life's Big Mistake
|
Right to Life’s Big Mistake
I have been a
member and supporter of RTL for over 30 years. Unfortunately
I feel that RTL made a serious misjudgment in endorsing Mike
Cox for governor. Pete Hoekstra, Mike Bouchard, Mike Cox,
and Tom George have all been endorsed by RTL in past
elections. I believe the best course of action for RTL to
have taken would have been to reject Rick Snyder for not
meeting their criteria and allow voters to make a choice
between the other candidates. They should have focused their
efforts against Rick Snyder, instead of supporting the only
candidate for governor who went negative, trashing his
opponents instead of focusing on his record, the issues and
his plans for Michigan. RTL should have chose the strongest
RTL candidate with highest moral character, but they allowed
politics, polls and special interest groups to affect their
choice, as several large organizations all decided to
endorse Mike Cox within a two day period. They strayed from
their mission, so that they could sit at the table with all
of the big PACs and attempt to be a king maker instead of
voice for life.
This is not the
first time RTL has made the political choice in favor of a
weaker RTL candidate, but it is one that that was so blatant
on such a grand scale that they cannot cover it up and need
to be called to task for it. President of RTL, Barbra
Listing, and Michigan RTL are to be commended for their past
accomplishments and the direct effect they have had on
reducing the number of abortions in Michigan over the past
30 years. However, in recent years they have become more
political and far less responsive to their supporters
concern about the direction they seem to be headed. This
happens to elected officials who forget who elected them and
it happens to large PACs who think they know more than group
they are supposed to be advocating for. There needs to be a
change in the leadership structures in RTL, because they
have been there too long, they have become too political and
they have forgotten what their true purpose and mandate is.
Many who stand
for life in Michigan believe that RTL handed the Republican
Primary to the only candidate for governor who did not meet
their criteria, by making a political decision to support a
weaker RTL candidate with questionable character. Many of
their supporters cautioned RTL not to make this decision,
but they did not listen; now we have two candidates for
governor, neither of whom meets RTL's criteria.
RTL Email Responses
Lorraine VanBuren
iamwoc@yahoo.com
Dear Mr. Sheen,
A friend forwarded to me a post that you
wrote about RLM's endorsement of Mike Cox. You wrote exactly
how I feel!
I have been involved with our local RTL
affiliate for more than 20 years serving on its board and
various committees. Pete, Diane and their children were at
our home following the Fourth of July parade in Ludington in
which they participated as a part of Pete's very first
re-election campaign. My husband and I have supported Pete
in every re-election season ever since.
I saw Mike Cox's first TV ad in mid-May when
I was visiting my sister in Jackson. The ad was nothing more
than an attack on Pete Hoekstra! And now Cox is abusing his
RLM endorsement! The first robo-call that we received
following the endorsement was focused on the fact that Cox
was "the only candidate to be endorsed by Right to Life of
Michigan."
According to one of the people on the RLM-PAC
endorsement committee, RLM is terrified of Rick Snyder
winning the primary and they felt that Cox has the best
chance of defeating Snyder. They decided to endorse only Cox
because they didn't want to "split the pro-life vote." I
understand the committee has never made an anti-endorsement,
but this certainly would have been the year to start,
because the pro-life vote IS split.
If RLM-PAC's endorsement is to offset
Snyder's "pro-life" stance, then why aren't Cox's ads
emphasizing that, instead of Cox continuing to attack Pete?
As you said, Cox's campaign techniques are defining his
character. Should Cox win, I do believe that he will reap in
the general election campaign what he has sown in this
primary season. I am going to forward your post, with this
reply, to my e-mail list and pray that the eyes of voters
will be open on August 3 to vote for Pete Hoekstra.
Cordially,
Lorraine VanBuren
Scottville
|